2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota 4Runner. (266 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Lancia | Toyota |
| Model | Nea | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 4000 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2610 mm |
