2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2010 Citroen C5
To start off, 2010 Citroen C5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C5 (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C5 weights approximately 466 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C5. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2010 Citroen C5 | |
| Make | Lancia | Citroen |
| Model | Nea | C5 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2946 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1836 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2820 mm |
