2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Compass. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2010 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2010 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Lancia | Jeep |
Model | Nea | Compass |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2634 mm |