2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1996 Kia Capital
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Capital. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Capital would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1996 Kia Capital. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Capital.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Kia Capital. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Capital. (152 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Capital.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1996 Kia Capital | |
| Make | Land Rover | Kia |
| Model | Range Rover | Capital |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |
