2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado would be higher. At 6,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado (385 HP) has 286 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado (644 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | CU-X | Toronado |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 6967 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 385 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 644 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3030 mm |
