2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1995 Volvo 440
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volvo 440. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volvo 440 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1995 Volvo 440. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1995 Volvo 440. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 320 kg more than 1995 Volvo 440. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volvo 440. (125 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volvo 440.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 1995 Volvo 440 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | CU-X | 440 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1025 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |
