2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1996 Opel Corsa
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Opel Corsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Opel Corsa would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Opel Corsa. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1996 Opel Corsa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 490 kg more than 1996 Opel Corsa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Opel Corsa. (112 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Opel Corsa. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1996 Opel Corsa has manual transmission. 1996 Opel Corsa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 1996 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | CU-X | Corsa |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1686 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 855 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |