2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2012 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2012 Renault Thalia is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Thalia (104 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Thalia should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 345 kg more than 2012 Renault Thalia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Thalia. (148 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Thalia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2012 Renault Thalia | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | CU-X | Thalia |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1000 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2473 mm |
