2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 408 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CU-X | CLS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |