2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 380 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E (460 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2008 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | CU-X | E |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 4966 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 460 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1725 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |
