2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (140 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 144 kg more than 2010 Honda Civic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Civic. (173 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Civic. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2010 Honda Civic has manual transmission. 2010 Honda Civic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2010 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Mazda | Honda |
| Model | CU-X | Civic |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1800 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1201 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |
