2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse weights approximately 247 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (219 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CU-X | Eclipse |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1592 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2576 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 67 L |
