2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2010 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 307 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 307 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 307 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 307 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 139 kg more than 2010 Peugeot 307.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 307. (200 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 307. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2010 Peugeot 307 has manual transmission. 2010 Peugeot 307 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2010 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | CU-X | 307 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1206 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |