2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 1966 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Volvo P 1800. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo P 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 813 kg more than 1966 Volvo P 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo P 1800. (152 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo P 1800.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 1966 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | SUW | P 1800 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 1778 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1092 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2460 mm |