2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2012 Audi S4
To start off, 2012 Audi S4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S4 (333 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Because 2012 Audi S4 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi S4 (440 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 2012 Audi S4 has manual transmission. 2012 Audi S4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2012 Audi S4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | SUW | S4 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1097 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 333 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2809 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 64 L |
