2001 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher.
Because 2001 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 2001 Nissan Pathfinder has manual transmission. 2001 Nissan Pathfinder will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Pathfinder | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Pathfinder | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1867 mm |
