2001 Toyota HMV vs. 2012 Dodge Charger

To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota HMV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota HMV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2001 Toyota HMV. (202 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota HMV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Charger weights approximately 132 kg more than 2001 Toyota HMV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota HMV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (352 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota HMV. (280 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota HMV.

Compare all specifications: