2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2010 Acura TL
To start off, 2010 Acura TL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2010 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2010 Acura TL | |
Make | Toyota | Acura |
Model | Tundra | TL |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4966 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |