2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Toyota | Smart |
| Model | Tundra | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 33 L |
