2002 Acura EL vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura EL would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2002 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 947 kg more than 2002 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura EL. (156 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura EL | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Acura | Ford |
| Model | EL | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |
