2002 Acura RSX vs. 2005 Maserati Quattroporte

To start off, 2005 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 4,227 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Maserati Quattroporte (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Maserati Quattroporte weights approximately 707 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Maserati Quattroporte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Maserati Quattroporte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Maserati Quattroporte (451 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Maserati Quattroporte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Acura RSX 2005 Maserati Quattroporte
Make Acura Maserati
Model RSX Quattroporte
Year Released 2002 2005
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 4227 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 191 Nm 451 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1222 kg 1929 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 3070 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8 L/100km 16.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 90 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]