2002 Audi R8 vs. 1983 Holden Camira
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 524 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Camira weights approximately 1038 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Holden Camira. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 573 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 1983 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | R8 | Camira |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Drive Type | AWD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |
