2002 Audi R8 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (238 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (380 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | R8 | SS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Drive Type | AWD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 68 L |
