2002 BMW M3 vs. 1953 Bristol 403
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Bristol 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Bristol 403 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1953 Bristol 403. (86 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Bristol 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Bristol 403 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Bristol 403. (146 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Bristol 403.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1953 Bristol 403 | |
Make | BMW | Bristol |
Model | M3 | 403 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 146 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1225 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2900 mm |