2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1944 Maserati 4
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Maserati 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Maserati 4 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1944 Maserati 4. (217 HP @ 8000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1944 Maserati 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 988 kg more than 1944 Maserati 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1944 Maserati 4 has manual transmission. 1944 Maserati 4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1944 Maserati 4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | CTS | 4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1944 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2510 mm |