2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1945 Jeep CJ2
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 990 kg more than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1945 Jeep CJ2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Camaro | CJ2 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1945 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 461 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2040 mm |
