2002 Ford Econoline vs. 1997 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 755 kg more than 1997 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1997 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 1997 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | XK |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3040 mm |