2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1985 Renault Fuego
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault Fuego. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault Fuego would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Renault Fuego, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1985 Renault Fuego | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econovan | Fuego |
Year Released | 2002 | 1985 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |