2002 Ford Falcon vs. 1946 Simca 5
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 5 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1946 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 955 kg more than 1946 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Falcon | 1946 Simca 5 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Falcon | 5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1946 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2010 mm |