2002 Ford Ka vs. 2008 Pontiac G5
To start off, 2008 Pontiac G5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Pontiac G5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Pontiac G5 (171 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Pontiac G5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Pontiac G5 (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2008 Pontiac G5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 2008 Pontiac G5 | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ka | G5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 49 L |