2002 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Honda Civic. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Civic.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Civic. (127 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Civic |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |