2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 492 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 543 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tonka | MPV |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2966 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2850 mm |
