2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2010 BMW 116
To start off, 2010 BMW 116 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Tonka (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 BMW 116. (116 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 116. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 116 weights approximately 68 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 116. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 554 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 116. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 116.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 2010 BMW 116 | |
| Make | Ford | BMW |
| Model | Tonka | 116 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4239 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1748 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1421 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2660 mm |
