2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage weights approximately 328 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. (469 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
| Model | Tonka | Vantage |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5935 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7300 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 469 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4382 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2600 mm |
