2002 Holden HSV vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 507 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (185 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75. 1998 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2002 Holden HSV has manual transmission. 2002 Holden HSV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden HSV | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | HSV | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |