2002 Holden UTE vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, both 2002 Holden UTE and 2002 MCC Crossblade were released in the same year (2002). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 134 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 760 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden UTE | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Holden | MCC |
| Model | UTE | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 1810 mm |
