2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2010 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2010 GMC Canyon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2010 GMC Canyon. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2010 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Canyon weights approximately 678 kg more than 2002 Jaguar X400.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 GMC Canyon. (259 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 GMC Canyon. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2010 GMC Canyon has manual transmission. 2010 GMC Canyon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2010 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | Jaguar | GMC |
| Model | X400 | Canyon |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 259 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2478 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 72 L |
