2002 Jaguar XJ vs. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (223 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 420 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ.

Because 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (381 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover.

Compare all specifications: