2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (480 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | Wrangler | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2774 mm |
