2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 684 kg more than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. (372 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 439 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
