2002 Mazda B2500 vs. 2010 Kia Forte

To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 443 kg more than 2010 Kia Forte.

Because 2002 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Forte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Forte (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda B2500. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda B2500.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mazda B2500 2010 Kia Forte
Make Mazda Kia
Model B2500 Forte
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 82 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 195 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1740 kg 1297 kg
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 4481 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2990 mm 2649 mm