2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1982 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 991 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Kadett is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Kadett weights approximately 45 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1982 Opel Kadett | |
Make | MCC | Opel |
Model | Crossblade | Kadett |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2520 mm |