2002 MCC Smart vs. 1943 Simca 5
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Simca 5 would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1943 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1943 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Smart weights approximately 230 kg more than 1943 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Smart | 1943 Simca 5 | |
| Make | MCC | Simca |
| Model | Smart | 5 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1943 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2010 mm |
