2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 1093 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi eK | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
| Model | eK | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1883 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3052 mm |
