2002 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Holden Barina
To start off, 2009 Holden Barina is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Barina (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio. 2002 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Barina has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Barina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 2009 Holden Barina | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Clio | Barina |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |