2002 Toyota ES 3 vs. 2010 Renault Logan
To start off, 2010 Renault Logan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota ES 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota ES 3 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Logan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Logan weights approximately 470 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Toyota ES 3 | 2010 Renault Logan | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | ES 3 | Logan |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2910 mm |