2002 Toyota Pod vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Pod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Pod would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Pod. (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Pod. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo S40 weights approximately 399 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (320 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Toyota Pod | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Pod | S40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1339 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 60 L |