2002 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 240 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 830 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 2002 ZAZ Wagon has manual transmission. 2002 ZAZ Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | ZAZ | Kia |
Model | Wagon | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2845 mm |