2002 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Kia Rio
To start off, 2010 Kia Rio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Rio (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Rio weights approximately 361 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Kia Rio | |
| Make | ZAZ | Kia |
| Model | Wagon | Rio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4026 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2499 mm |
