2003 Audi A2 vs. 1975 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2003 Audi A2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Audi A2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A2 (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Audi A2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A2 (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A2 | 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | A2 | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
